Barbados vs China Military Comparison
Side-by-side military strength: active personnel, defense budgets, air force aircraft, and naval assets.
Barbados
600 active troops
$40000000 budget
VS
China
2M active troops
$300B budget
0
Tanks
5,651
10
Armored Vehicles
35,000
4
Artillery
10,366
0
Rocket Systems
2,430
0
Fighter Jets
1,200
1
Helicopters
912
6
Warships
777
0
Submarines
79
Nuclear Arsenal
China
500
WARHEADS
Barbados
0
WARHEADS
Warheads Over Time
Estimated total warhead inventories — Federation of American Scientists / SIPRI
Defense Budget vs GDP
Historical defense spending and how it compares to each country's GDP. The % of GDP view normalises for economic size so smaller economies aren't drowned out by absolute dollar figures.
Defense Budget Over Time ($B)
Defense Budget as % of GDP
No defense budget data yet for Barbados.
Run
rake data:defense_budget:update to populate.
Source: World Bank Open Data API (MS.MIL.XPND.CD)
Military Active Personnel
China
2.04M
TROOPS
Barbados
610
TROOPS
China has 3336.07× the active personnel of Barbados
Air Force Total Aircraft
China
3.29K
AIRCRAFT
Barbados
3
AIRCRAFT
China has 1095.00× the aircraft of Barbados
Land Forces — Detailed Metrics
| Metric |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Active Personnel | 610 | 2,035,000 |
| Reserve Personnel | 430 | 510,000 |
| Total Military Personnel | 1,040 | 2,545,000 |
| Defense Budget (USD) | $35,000,000 | $292,000,000,000 |
| Tanks | 0 | 5,651 |
| Armored Vehicles | 10 | 35,000 |
| Self-Propelled Artillery | 0 | 4,120 |
| Towed Artillery | 4 | 6,246 |
| Rocket Projectors | 0 | 2,430 |
Air Force — Detailed Metrics
| Metric |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Total Aircraft | 3 | 3,285 |
| Fighters | 0 | 1,200 |
| Attack Aircraft | 0 | 1,600 |
| Transport Aircraft | 2 | 406 |
| Trainer Aircraft | 1 | 314 |
| Helicopters | 1 | 912 |
| Attack Helicopters | 0 | 281 |
See economy, trade, demographics, and more for this comparison.
View full Barbados vs China comparison →
Data compiled from World Bank, IMF, Global Firepower, SIPRI, Numbeo, and Pew Research.
Last updated July 2026.
Sources & methodology